PE Logo
Employment Update for Small Businesses
April 2008
Dear Peter,
 

This month we look at the new rules which require some employers to inform and consult with their workforce over various issues.  We consider the impact that employees' mental-health problems can have on business during the national Depression Awareness Week.  We also approach with Goodhew-mour the question of whether baldness can be considered a disability!

As ever, feel free to contact me if would like any more information about any of these news items.  If you need any help or advice why not take advantage of my free initial consultation.
 
Please forward this email to any of your contacts who might find it of benefit? 
 
Regards
 
Peter EtheringtonPeter Etherington
Tel: 01664 430373
How much should you involve staff in business decisions?
Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004

Since 1 April the Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations 2004 have applied with respect to employers of 50 or more employees.  The regulations are quite complex but they do allow employers to agree their own arrangements with workers which can be quite light-touch.  In the absence of any such agreement the Regulations compel employers to negotiate an agreement with employees and they prescribe the type of information to be disclosed and in some cases specify that consultation must be "with a view to reaching agreement". 

This is quite a different approach to employee involvement for many employers, particularly smaller, privately owned companies.  In many cases the idea of consulting employees over business plans and involving them in decision-making would hold very little appeal and would run contrary to normal business practices. 

The Regulations do not apply until at least 10% of employees have made a request to their employer (or anonymously to the Central Arbitration Committee).  Employers, however, may choose not to run the risk of waiting to see whether or not such a request arises and take the initiative by arranging a voluntary agreement.

Can you recognise the signs of depression?
Why helping employees with mental health problems is good for business

This week is Depression Awareness Week, as publicised by ACAS.  Nearly 3 in 10 employees have mental health problems each year and the advice to employers is to be alert to symptoms of depression among your own workforce.  There is still a great taboo related to mental health issues which makes it hard for employees suffering depression to ask for help.  However, support and understanding from employers can help many employees take the first steps towards getting professional help.

Taking an understanding approach to depression also makes good business sense.  Employers who discipline or dismiss employees suffering from depression may be liable for claims of unfair dismissal and/or disability discrimination, even if they purport not to have known that the employee had depression.  Early intervention by employers may also result in employees receiving professional help sooner and, hence, may result in them recovering and re-engaging fully with work much quicker.

The signs to look out for are behavioural changes, particularly where a previously competent employee starts to find it hard to cope with work.  Becoming distracted or demotivated, and frequent short-term sickness absence are also symptoms of depression.

If you suspect one of your employees might be suffering from depression, talk to them informally about it and let them know of your concerns.  Ask them if there is anything at work that is causing them difficulties (don't forget you are liable for the health and safety of your employees, including their mental health, so it is in your best interests to try to identify problems before they cause harm).  Point them towards their GP or a counsellor for professional support.

Is baldness a disability?
Tribunal decides disability claim is a step too far 

On a lighter note, an Employment Tribunal in Scotland recently decided, unsurprisingly, that baldness is not a disability as defined under the Disability Discrimination Act.  In Denny v Falkirk Council, a former school teacher alleged that he had been harassed by pupils because of his baldness and that this taunting had had a "substantial and long term adverse effect" on his ability to do his job.  The tribunal, however, recognised that baldness is not an impairment and that, if it was, other physical features such as a big nose or prominent ears could also be described as disabilities

The cases continues, however, as Mr Denny is also claiming constructive dismissal.  If his employer did not take appropriate steps to try to protect him from harassment by pupils, there is a chance that this aspect of his claim could succeed.

Peter Etherington Employment Law Services
Join Our Mailing List